2019
Journal Articles
Ismaïl Badache; Sébastien Fournier; Adrian Chifu
Prédire l'intensité de contradiction dans les commentaires : faible, forte ou très forte ? Journal Article
In: Le Bulletin de l'Association Française pour l'Intelligence Artificielle (AFIA 2019), 2019.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Aspect Detection, Contradiction Intensity, Criteria Evaluation, Sentiment Analysis
@article{Badache2019AFIA,
title = {Prédire l'intensité de contradiction dans les commentaires : faible, forte ou très forte ?},
author = {Ismaïl Badache and Sébastien Fournier and Adrian Chifu},
url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01872267/document},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-12-01},
journal = {Le Bulletin de l'Association Française pour l'Intelligence Artificielle (AFIA 2019)},
abstract = {Reviews on web resources (e.g. courses, movies) become increasingly exploited in text analysis tasks (e.g. opinion detection, controversy detection). This paper investigates contradiction intensity in reviews exploiting different features such as variation of ratings and variation of polarities around specific entities (e.g. aspects, topics). Firstly, aspects are identified according to the distributions of the emotional terms in the vicinity of the most frequent nouns in the reviews collection. Secondly, the polarity of each review segment containing an aspect is estimated. Only resources containing these aspects with opposite polarities are considered. Finally, some features are evaluated, using feature selection algorithms, to determine their impact on the effectiveness of contradiction intensity detection. The selected features are used to learn some state-of-the-art learning approaches. The experiments are conducted on the Massive Open Online Courses data set containing 2244 courses and their 73,873 reviews, collected from coursera.org. Results showed that variation of ratings, variation of polarities, and reviews quantity are the best predictors of contradiction intensity. Also, J48 was the most effective learning approach for this type of classification.},
keywords = {Aspect Detection, Contradiction Intensity, Criteria Evaluation, Sentiment Analysis},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Reviews on web resources (e.g. courses, movies) become increasingly exploited in text analysis tasks (e.g. opinion detection, controversy detection). This paper investigates contradiction intensity in reviews exploiting different features such as variation of ratings and variation of polarities around specific entities (e.g. aspects, topics). Firstly, aspects are identified according to the distributions of the emotional terms in the vicinity of the most frequent nouns in the reviews collection. Secondly, the polarity of each review segment containing an aspect is estimated. Only resources containing these aspects with opposite polarities are considered. Finally, some features are evaluated, using feature selection algorithms, to determine their impact on the effectiveness of contradiction intensity detection. The selected features are used to learn some state-of-the-art learning approaches. The experiments are conducted on the Massive Open Online Courses data set containing 2244 courses and their 73,873 reviews, collected from coursera.org. Results showed that variation of ratings, variation of polarities, and reviews quantity are the best predictors of contradiction intensity. Also, J48 was the most effective learning approach for this type of classification.
TRANSLATE with x
English
TRANSLATE with
Enable collaborative features and customize widget: Bing Webmaster Portal